.:SonicBomb:.
    Login or Register
::  Home  ::  Videos  ::  Your Account  ::  Forums  ::  RSS Feed  ::
 
 
::Content::
  • Atomic
  • - Aviation
    - Aircraft
    - Military
    - Explosions
    - WW2
    - Various
    - Hi-Def
    - Photos

    - Wallpaper

    - Nuclear

    - WWI

    - WWII

    Advertisment
    Search
    Custom Search
    User Info
    Welcome, Anonymous
    Nickname
    Password
    (Register)
    Membership:
    Latest: Margret11E
    New Today: 0
    New Yesterday: 0
    Overall: 751

    People Online:
    Visitors: 0
    Members: 0
    Total: 0

     
    The Nuclear Outboard Motor
     
    In the early 1960s the U.S. Navy worked to develop a disposable atomic-powered outboard motor that would have made America’s warships a Hell of a lot more efficient. But there were some problems.|Read More|


    File this one under weapon designs from the atomic golden age spawned during the Cold War alongside undersea bases, atomic artillery, nuclear cruise missiles and nuclear powered planes.

    The nuclear boat motor actually began life as airplane propulsion, if you can believe that. America’s two great aircraft engine-makers, General Electric and Pratt & Whitney, both hand their fingers in this particular radioactive pie.

    Pratt & Whitney tinkered with a closed-loop system in which the radioactive components were kept isolated from the jet exhaust. GE, however, opted for the easier-to-develop open-loop system, which led to nearly flight-ready hardware … at the regrettable cost of highly-radioactive jet exhaust.

    The safety issues alone doomed the nuke jet — to say nothing of the extraordinary cost. In 1961, after spending nearly 15 years and $1 billion — $7.7 billion in today’s dollars — the feds killed off the nuclear-powered aircraft program. But GE wasted no time looking for other uses for its designs.

    The engine-maker ended up publishing a 21-volume report on a proposal to put its nuclear engine in a pod and bolt it onto a ship.

    In one sleek fat, torpedo-shaped pod, GE proposed to encapsulate a nuclear reactor and a gas turbine in inert neon gas. The reactor would heat the gas which would drive the turbine as it expanded, while reduction gearing would translate the turbine’s spin into propeller revolutions. The seawater surrounding the pod would act as coolant and shielding.

    Unlike an internal-combustion engine, the atomic outboard could run for tens of thousands of miles before needing refueling. If a malfunction demanded shutdown or scuttling of the nuclear engine, the pod could simply be jettisoned into the deep. We are talking the late 1950s, after all. Apparently nobody worried about depositing a bunch of radioactive waste all over the ocean floor.

    A typical 601B power pod would be a cylindrical capsule 18 feet long, four feet in diameter and weighing 12 tons. Fueled with 250 pounds of U-235, it could produce 3,700 horsepower for over six months.

    Like an outboard motor, such a power pod could be attached to pretty much any seaworthy vessel — and you could easily de-nuclearize it later. These units could easily be usded as propulsion systems for cargo vessels. Since all of the propulsion system was in outboard pods, the ship could be nothing but a big empty cargo hold.

    For military vessels, replacing the conventional engines with 601Bs could potentially double their available payload. GE’s in-house artists sketched a destroyer and a submarine on patrol, each driven by whirring 601Bs. The pods would be mounted on fins or pylons attached to the same places where conventional propeller shafts go.

    Besides subs and destroyers, the Navy’s now-retired hydrofoils were another potential application for the atomic outboard, as they already carried their motors in pods. But the thought of enduring a hydrofoil’s bronco-busting ride for days on end is enough to give pause to the firmest constitution.

    As well as leaving a trail of radiation, the pods would have been very noisy, and would have made American warships easy targets for prowling Soviet subs.

    Source - medium.com


    | More
    Posted on Tuesday, September 03 @ 14:42:01 MDT by sonicbom
     
    Related Links
    · More about
    · News by sonicbom


    Most read story about :
    The Man Who Stuck His Head Inside a Particle Accelerator

    Article Rating
    Average Score: 5
    Votes: 1


    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad

    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

    | Privacy Policy || Contact us |

    Page Generation: 0.09 Seconds
    :: In the future we will all be robots ::